Original Ad vs. Subvertisement

Reading Response to "The Whole Ball of Wax"

I agree with the initial statement made by Laura Hoptman and Peter Eleey that "art has the ability to change the world" (Saltz 1). The article gives examples of how art cannot physically change large scale problems like curing diseases or stopping global warming, but I believe art can strongly impact individual's lives. The article includes how "art is part of a universal force. It has no less purpose or meaning than science, religion, philosophy, politics, or any other discipline, and is as much a form of intelligence or knowing as a first kiss, a last goodbye, or an algebraic equation" (1). This statement stuck with me because oftentimes art is just looked at as an image, figure, or drawing. To me, art is much more than what is shown on the page or screen. I think that is also what Jerry Saltz was trying to get across by writing this article. According to "The Whole Ball of Wax," Saltz uses ideas from a philosopher named Mary Midgley to help refute ...

Visual Analysis of Post-Modern Project

This project was done by first photoshopping images to represent the quote " The great person is ahead of their time, the smart make something out of it, and the blockhead, sets themselves against it." Then, the next form of medium used was paint. This provides a visual texture, due to the obvious brush strokes. The composition is a swirl and the eye follows the brains around the page in a circle as well as around the swirling clouds. The piece is very dark with some aspects of lighter values from the white. The color scheme is a triad with red, yellow, and blue, in addition to the contrast of shades of black and white. The one side of this piece makes me feel chaos and confusion. There is a lot going on with all the swirls and hands coming from every direction. This is compared with a more calm and simple piece right next to it. This side makes me feel more relaxed and think more simplistically. The cont...

Colors- Radiolab Podcast

This podcast begins with the discussion of Isaac Newton trying to discover if the color is within or outside the mind. Most people know his experiments with the prism, but I did not know that he stuck something into his eye to try to discover the answer that question. I find this disturbing and interesting that he would choose to do this. Eventually, his experimenting led to the findings of what we know today. I thought that many of the points that were made in this podcast were very interesting. It surprised me that all humans/animals see different variations of colors. Dogs only see blues and greens. They do not have the cone for red. This one cone that they do not have adds such a limitation on colors. On the other side of this, sparrows can see more than us. They can see ultraviolets. In addition, butterflies have 7 photoreceptors, and a mantis shrimp has 16, while humans only have 3. Also, I thought it...

Brianna Kobrin's Blog

Search This Blog